How historian compression distorts machine learning
The series in a historian is not the series the sensor saw. Compression settings change what features and models learn.
From historians to machine learning, time-series data powers industrial analytics. A practical guide to collection, quality, and the forecasting methods that actually work on plant data.
Industrial time-series data is continuous, high-volume, and unevenly informative: a temperature tag may generate thousands of samples an hour while changing meaningfully only a few times. The defining properties are timestamped values with quality flags, collected from historians, PLCs, OPC UA servers, and IoT gateways.
Data quality at the source determines everything downstream:
Most plant data shows daily and weekly patterns: production shifts, ambient temperature cycles, and maintenance windows. Before any modelling, separate:
Classical decomposition (moving averages, STL) makes these components visible and is often all a plant needs for monitoring and alerting.
Forecasting methods form a spectrum of complexity:
The practical rule: start with the simplest model that meets the accuracy requirement, evaluate on a hold-out period, and only escalate complexity when the business question demands it.
The value is not the forecast line — it is the decision it supports: scheduling maintenance before failure, optimizing setpoints against predicted load, or detecting an anomaly early. Industrial analytics projects fail most often on data quality and unclear decision context, not on model choice.